• If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Organizational and Staffing Structure - Guides

Page history last edited by Dominique Dore 1 year, 9 months ago

Front Page / Campus-Wide Center / Campus Wide Centers Staffing / Guides

 

 

Campus Wide Centers:

Organizational and Staffing Structure 


Overview  |  Guides  |  Campus Examples  |  Documents to Download


Guides below include: Staffing Models, Job Descriptions, and Benchmarking Your Center 


Staffing Models


The Bonner Foundation requires one full-time staff member for every 40 students in the program. It is common for staff to manage other campus-wide programs and engagement efforts. For more on staffing requirements and recommendations, see: [ADD LINK]

 

According to reports from centers across the Bonner network in the summer of 2015, centers generally have a core professional and student leadership staff that ranges from 1.5 (for a small start-up program of 10 students) to 13 (the University of Richmond’s Bonner Center). The average center in the network has 5 staff, with 2 dedicated to the Bonner Program. 

 

The slides below explain some approaches to staffing your Bonner Program and Center.

 


Typical Job Functions 


  • Center Director (usually the Bonner Director) 
  • Bonner Coordinator
  • Faculty Coordinator (a person focused on training and developing faculty engagement)
  • VISTA staff
  • Work Study student staff
  • Bonner Senior Interns (or other student leaders) 

 


Benchmarking Your Center 


 

Benchmarking your campus’s center and operations against others may also be a valuable effort. Some campuses do this in conjunction with broader strategic planning efforts. You may want to consider creating a group to benchmark with using the following considerations:

 

  • Institutional Type
  • Mission/vision (i.e, other schools that are doing a similar QEP)
  • Size/demographics of student body
  • Rankings or ratings (peer and aspirant groups): besides U.S. News and World Report, you may want to look at these listings:
    • Colleges That Change Lives
    • Colleges That Care
    • Fiske Guide to Colleges 
    • U.S. News also has some other rankings like Most Innovative Colleges or Best Colleges for Service-Learning that may interest you
  • Sense of place (i.e., setting, urban, rural, town and opportunities for engagement)
  • Other institutional characteristics (i.e., religious affiliation

 

One good resource for looking at the development and growth of civic engagement as a whole is the annual survey of the national Campus Compact. You can find that in the Documents to Download.

 

For campuses and centers interested in growing larger campus-wide offices, nationally, there are some centers for community engagement that have larger staff. Some of the largest (and oldest) centers nationally are:

  • The University of Utah’s Lowell Bennion Community Service Center (founded 1987): with over 24K undergraduate students and nearly 8K graduate students, this center has a dedicated staff of 11, as well as formalized student and community boards.
  • Stanford University’s Haas Center for Public Service (founded 1988): with an undergraduate population of nearly 7,000, the Haas Center engages about 1,000 students annually. It has a staff/faculty of 38. See https://haas.stanford.edu/  

 


Student-Led Campus-Wide Engagement


  

 Guide to ignite community a community service initiative using student leadership while addressing community needs. 

 

  • Building-It-Upproduced by Campus Outreach Opportunity League (COOL) 

A workbook that was designed to accompany a one-day workshop on strengthening campus-based community service programs. The workbook provides opportunities to examine the Coalition of Project Model, Recruitment, Gaining Support, and Developing Action Plans.