• If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Organizational and Staffing Structure - Documents to Download

Page history last edited by Liz Brandt 3 months, 1 week ago

Front Page / Campus-Wide Center Campus Wide Centers Staffing / Documents to Download

 

 

Campus Wide Centers:

Organizational and Staffing Structure 


Overview  |  Guides  |  Campus Examples  |  Documents to Download



 

  

Presentations


 

Campus-wide Collaboration 

 

Staffing Structure

   

 

Tools


 

  • Bonner Campus Self-Assessment Tool: This instrument—a Self-Assessment Tool for Bonner Programs and Campus-wide Institutionalization—has been designed to bring together the most important indicators of a high- quality, comprehensive program. It has been designed to provide the campus staff who build and manage the Bonner Program and other civic engagement initiatives with a set of key guidelines for which to strive. Many of the items in the rubric have been informed by other nationally recognized rubrics for civic engagement, such as those developed by Barbara Holland, Andrew Furco, Campus Compact, AAC&U, and Campus-Community Partnerships for Health. Moreover, this instrument incorporates components that are specifically tied to the frameworks and required activities of the Bonner Program. The tool consists of more than 40 indicators in a rubric form. Below is an example:

 

Appropriate governance: The governance for the Bonner Program provides it with the access to institutional resources and support from senior leadership that it needs while also providing the program with appropriate direction and supervision.

 

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Level 5

We have poorly defined lines of access and accountability within the institution; the Bonner Program is poorly resourced and supported.

Our campus governance does not provide adequate access to authority, resources, and direction.

Our campus governance provides adequate authority and resources, while also providing adequate direction and supervision.

Our campus governance is strong, providing excellent access to senior leadership and resources, as well as direction and supervision.

Our campus governance is superb; Director/ Coordinator have excellent access to senior leadership and resources, possess a sense of direction and autonomy, while also having good oversight.

 

 

Handbooks


 Guide to ignite community a community service initiative using student leadership while addressing community needs. 

 

A workbook that was designed to accompany a one-day workshop on strengthening campus-based community service programs. The workbook provides opportunities to examine the Coalition of Project Model, Recruitment, Gaining Support, and Developing Action Plans. 

 

 

Literature


  • Deepening Community Engagement in Higher Education (Palgrave, 2013) —  These chapters are available in , edited by Ariane Hoy and Mathew Johnson.  Bonner Programs were provided a copy of this book, or contact the Foundation to see if you can obtain one. Also available on Amazon and other sellers. For more information and additional ideas, see the following articles:
    • Marshall Welch and John Saltmarsh (2013): Best Practices and Infrastructures for Campus Centers of Community Engagement - discusses the top ten characteristics of effective and comprehensive campus centers, as drawn from research involving institutions that have earned the Carnegie Community Engagement Classification
    • Rick Ellis and Kristine Hart (2013): “If you build it, they will come”: Building a Structure for Institutional Change - discusses how a student developmental model and student leadership can help foster the creation of a campus-wide infrastructure for engagement
    •  Abby Kiesa and Ariane Hoy (2013): Leveraging New Technologies for Engagement - discusses practices and findings for using social media and technology as a tool to broaden and deepen campus-wide community engagement (especially by students), which drew on the experiences of campuses in the Bonner network experimenting with support from a Corporation for National Service Grant to the Bonner Foundation
    •  Ariane Hoy and Mathew Johnson (2013): Strategic Planning for Centers: Fostering Pervasive, Deep, Integrated, Developmental Community Engagement - discusses a few examples about how strategic planning by a center for civic/community engagement can foster alignment with the institutional mission and strategic plan, as well as support and resources. See more on Strategic Planning here on the wiki.

 

  • Engaging Higher Education: Purpose, Platforms, and Programs for Community Engagement:  For directors of campus centers that have received the Carnegie Classification for Community Engagement, this book offers research and models to further advance their work. For directors starting out, or preparing for application for the Carnegie Classification, it provides guidance on setting up and structuring centers as well as practical insights into the process of application and the criteria they will need to meet.

 

 

  • This new report, Community Engagement Terms and Meanings: A Deeper Dive into Definitionscreated through the Coastal Academic Alliance seeks to define and clarify the wide-ranging set and use of terms related to community engagement with the hope of reducing confusion and improving understanding not just for specific terms, but also for recognizing the value of community-based learning more broadly across departmental and institutional uses.